Current Gibraltar MLC guidance with a risk-based Fresh Water Safety Plan, water production, bunkering and documented checks.
HOW THE MEMBER REGISTER WORKS
Four steps to a review-ready vessel dossier
Choose only your vessel's registered flag. The crew records what can be demonstrated; Vorenico assesses the relevant evidence and identifies outstanding actions.
01
Describe the vessel
Vessel name, commercial or private status, length, GT, year and applicable certificate/code.
02
Choose a status
Evidence supplied, action needed, not checked yet, or not applicable with a clear reason.
03
Reference proof
Enter a logbook page, inspection date, laboratory report ID, maintenance record or corrective action. This field is text only; documents are shared separately.
04
Save and export
Save your draft, export the CSV and share that register and source documents with Vorenico for review.
Example: Weekly water inspection → Evidence supplied → “Inspection 26 Oct 2026; deck logbook p.84; responsible engineer: Chief Engineer”.
OFFICIAL SOURCES · REVIEWED 28 OCTOBER 2026
Gibraltar Maritime Administration water compliance
Gibraltar MLN 014(b), issued 6 December 2024, supersedes MLN 014(a). Part 3 gives technical evidence-of-compliance guidance for loading, disinfecting, producing, storing and distributing potable water. It recommends a Fresh Water Safety Plan for complex systems, describes weekly inspection practice and distinguishes a 0.2 mg/L chlorine bunkering recommendation from a compulsory universal chlorine requirement. A published MLN is an accepted way to demonstrate compliance, but equivalent or higher alternative evidence may be considered.
Not a certificate
This evidence register is a member self-assessment tool; a recorded Vorenico technical review is not a statutory flag-state clearance.
Duty: binding if relevant regulation applies. Conditional: only under stated code and circumstances. Best practice: prudent engineering control, not an independent statutory limit. Review: confirm with the administration or applicable code before claiming compliance.
MEMBER ACCESS
Sign in to access the full resources
Sign in to save your private Gibraltar vessel evidence register.
Document frequent master-authorised water inspections
Inspection
Conditional
MLN 014(b) describes inspections at intervals no greater than seven days as evidence of compliance. Confirm legal scope and equivalent inspection method.
When in scope: Ships subject to MLC checks and MLN 014(b) compliance method
Evidence requested: Weekly log dates, responsible person, corrective records
Apply a vessel-specific Fresh Water Safety Plan approach
Water Safety Plan
Best practice
Complete hazard analysis, source-to-tap treatment controls, monitoring and corrective actions; guidance recommends a FWSP, not a universal statutory certificate.
When in scope: Especially yachts with complex onboard systems
Evidence requested: System diagram, risk register and FWSP
Provide failsafe alarm on primary automatic disinfection
Treatment
Conditional
Guidance calls for bypass protection and audible/visible fault detection, with a safe outcome on malfunction. Verify individual design and accepted alternatives.
When in scope: Where a primary automatic disinfection unit is installed
Evidence requested: Control philosophy, alarms, tests and commissioning
Interpret 0.2 mg/L free chlorine as guidance, not blanket duty
Desinfection
Best practice
MLN states that routine bunkering chlorination is not required in every case; 0.2 mg/L free chlorine (or 1.0 mg/L chloramines if chloraminated) is described as good practice where appropriate.
When in scope: When chlorinating loaded potable water
Evidence requested: Residual tests, source details, dosing procedure and contact time
Validate UV operation and limits of residual protection
UV
Best practice
UV lacks downstream residual action; provide appropriate intensity monitoring, alarms and maintenance, considering location and microbial growth in pipework.
When in scope: UV installed for drinking water treatment
Evidence requested: UV sizing, sensor data, lamp record and alarms
Assess RO source quality, monitoring and diversion
Watermaking
Best practice
Assess marine intake pollution, prefiltration and product quality. Reliable online monitoring and rapid action are essential where RO is relied on as treatment.
When in scope: Seawater RO/watermaking installed
Evidence requested: RO operation procedures, conductivity, reject diversion and water testing
Notice says storage should normally not be below two-day supply but can be adjusted for reliable onboard production. This is guidance, not an automatic absolute statutory threshold.
When in scope: Under MLN 014(b) storage guidance and actual vessel production
Evidence requested: Volume calculation, person numbers and verified watermaker capacity
Maintain a risk-based planned maintenance programme
Maintenance
Best practice
Use manufacturer-based maintenance of UV, filters, tanks, calorifiers, outlets and hoses; distinguish illustrative notice intervals from mandatory legal frequencies.
When in scope: All onboard water production/distribution components
Evidence requested: PMS tasks, servicing logs and inspected deficiencies
Record non-compliant samples and corrective actions
Incidents
Best practice
If monitoring shows unsafe water, consider isolate/alternative supply, investigate, repair and verify before return to service. Record owner, deadline and final test.
When in scope: All water systems with testing or incident programmes
Evidence requested: Incident log, lab reports, actions and return-to-service authority
Clarify unusual Isle of Man reference in Gibraltar notice
Source quality
Review
The published Gibraltar MLN 014(b) has an apparent copy-edit reference to the Isle of Man official logbook in §18. Do not interpret this as a Gibraltar requirement to use a Manx logbook; obtain GMA clarification if relied upon.
When in scope: Gibraltar inspection records from MLN 014(b)
Evidence requested: GMA clarification, Gibraltar vessel official logbook and actual inspection format
Editorial review: 28 October 2026. Flag State requirements are specific to the vessel, operating status, certificate, build date and accepted alternatives. Re-check the published code and flag/RO correspondence before claiming statutory compliance.
LET'S TALK WATER
Better decisions begin with independent advice.
Tell us about your vessel, water systems or technical challenge.